Architecture is [or has become] sterile. The domination of the visual has been accepted and embraced in both the process and the product. Ocularcentricism has reduced architecture to a mere backdrop to everyday life, a passively inhabited realm that has minimal impact on the experience of the occupant. Such an approach deprives us of the opportunity to indulge in a holistic experience of built space, an experience that envelops and challenges not only the five senses but also the haptic realm. Architecture should be active, a phenomenological and functional entity that engages and challenges the occupant in new and unexpected ways.
The relevant question is not what architecture is, but rather what architecture can become.
I think an interesting challenge for you this year will be to develop an representational language that is more than visual...
ReplyDelete